Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id RAA17256 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 17:39:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzxfx13453; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 14:15:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA04993; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 14:16:11 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 14:16:11 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <m0tYHZr-000If4C@mailbox.mcs.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: dma@mcs.com (Dan Ablan)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: SGI
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>What does you all think about Lightwave on the SGI???
I think it's great.
But, I'd rather spend the money a few Pentium 133's
or, a DEC Alpha or two.
With a few P133's, the rendering can be distributed,
and, you've got machine's that run everyday software.